Bitcoin runs on proof of work, not proof of stake, so there is no native staking mechanism and simply holding it does not make the protocol pay you anything. When a platform advertises Bitcoin staking rewards or an APY, that yield is coming from somewhere else entirely. Jake Claver walks through the real mechanisms behind those advertised returns, lending, options and covered calls, using Bitcoin as collateral, wrapping and bridging into DeFi, and structured products, then gives five questions to ask before handing Bitcoin to any platform.
Prefer the app?Watch on YouTube
Why Bitcoin staking doesn’t exist
Claver opens by clearing up the terminology. Bitcoin’s proof of work consensus does not rely on staked capital to validate blocks, so there is no protocol-level reward for locking up BTC the way there is on a proof of stake network. Any “staking” product marketed against Bitcoin is a label placed over a different financial mechanism, not a feature of the Bitcoin protocol itself.
What platforms mean when they advertise it
Once that distinction is clear, Claver explains what is actually generating the advertised yield when a platform uses the word staking next to Bitcoin. The return has to originate somewhere, and it is never the base layer. It comes from one of a handful of underlying activities, each carrying its own separate risk profile that the word “staking” tends to obscure.
Lending: who pays the interest and why
The first mechanism is lending. Claver walks through who is actually paying the interest on the other side of a yield-bearing Bitcoin product, typically a borrower using the BTC as collateral or a market maker deploying it, and why that counterparty is willing to pay for the liquidity in the first place.
Options, derivatives, and covered calls
The second mechanism is options and derivatives, specifically covered call strategies that generate premium income against a Bitcoin position. Claver is direct about the tradeoff involved: selling that upside caps how much a holder can capture if the price moves sharply higher, which is the cost of the premium rather than a free return.
Bitcoin as collateral, not a sale
Claver then covers using Bitcoin as collateral to borrow against rather than selling it outright. That approach lets a holder access liquidity while keeping the underlying position, a different goal from yield generation: access to cash without triggering a taxable sale of the asset.
Bitcoin DeFi and what wrapping introduces
The video also addresses Bitcoin DeFi, where BTC is wrapped or bridged onto another chain to make it usable in decentralized protocols. Claver frames this plainly: wrapping and bridging introduce a new layer of smart contract and custodial risk on top of whatever yield mechanism is being used underneath, risk that does not exist when holding Bitcoin natively.
Structured products and the institutional picture
The later chapters cover structured products, which combine several of these mechanisms, lending, derivatives, and collateral, into a single packaged offering, along with the wider institutional picture of how larger holders approach Bitcoin exposure without relying on any single yield source.
Five questions to ask anyone offering yield
Claver closes with a practical checklist for evaluating any platform advertising yield on Bitcoin: where exactly the return is coming from, who is on the other side of the trade, what happens to the principal if that counterparty fails, whether the product involves lockups or liquidity restrictions, and whether the advertised rate is sustainable or subsidized to attract deposits. He argues that if a platform cannot answer where the yield originates in plain terms, that is itself the answer.
Watch the full breakdown above for the complete walkthrough of each mechanism and the full five-question checklist.
Educational only, not tax, legal, or investment advice. Check primary sources and speak with a qualified professional before making financial decisions.
